|
Horse
slaughter is the practice of slaughtering horses for meat. These animals
come from auctions, private sellers, and from wild herds. Sometimes these
horses are sick and injured but they can also be for sale by their owners.
Most are brought to the slaughterhouses
by contract buyers who collect horses from all across the country, also
known as kill buyers. Horses that are killed for reasons other
than human consumption go to the knackers' yard.
Many people do not agree with the slaughter of horses, perceiving horses
as companion animals like cats and dogs, or deserving special status like
sacred cows in Hinduism. Many horsemen do not consider horses to be meat,
but rather athletes.
In most countries where horses are slaughtered for food, they are
processed in a similar fashion to cattle, i.e., in large-scale factory
slaughterhouses (abattoirs). The animals are rendered unconscious by being
shot in the brain with a metal rod, using a captive bolt stunner -
pneumatically or cartridge driven. They are then killed by being
exsanguinated ("bled out") by severing the jugular vein or carotid artery
while suspended by the rear leg by a heavy chain shackle. Horse slaughter
is similar to beef slaughter except for the fact that the overhead rail
that the dressed horse carcasses ride on during process is two foot higher
than a feedlot beef dressing line to suit the varying sizes of the
carcasses. These are then butchered, that is, cut into smaller pieces for
easier handling. The residue may be rendered to make the fats usable.
Sale and consumption of horse meat is illegal in California, and Illinois
is considering a similar measure. Horse meat supplied by three abattoirs
in the U.S. was sold to zoos to feed their carnivores, and was exported to
Europe, Mexico, or Japan for human consumption. In 2007 two horse meat
abattoirs in Texas were ordered closed. Later that year, an abattoir in
Illinois, reported to be the last horse meat abattoir in the U.S., was
closed.
There is an effort in the United States to create a law, the American
Horse Slaughter Prevention Act, designed to stop the slaughter of horses
for human consumption. On September 8, 2006, the House
of Representatives passed a bill which, had it also passed the Senate and
been signed by the President, would have made killing horses for human
consumption an illegal practice in the United States.
Most people in the US are not aware that horses are slaughtered there for
human consumption in other countries. According to some of these polls, in
New York, 64% of people polled believed that slaughtering horses for meat
was illegal, while in Indiana, 91% believe that horse slaughter should be
banned. In Texas 89% of voters are unaware that horse slaughter goes on in
their own state.
Prior to 2007, three major equine slaughterhouses operated in the United
States: Dallas Crown, Inc. in Kaufman, Texas; Beltex Corporation in Fort
Worth, Texas; and Cavel International, Inc. in DeKalb, Illinois. All with
Belgian ownership, although Multimeat NW has also been listed as French
and Dutch owned. Velda NV owns Cavel, Multimeat NV owns Beltex and
Chevideco owns Dallas Crown.
The slaughterhouses exported approximately 42 million dollars worth of
horse meat per year. Since the human consumption of horse meat is
generally considered unacceptable by the majority of the United States
populace and is illegal in several states, most of the horses slaughtered
for this purpose in the United States were exported to other countries,
such as France, Belgium and Japan, where the meat is considered a
delicacy. As prominently stated on their website, Dallas Crown “provides
Carnivore Diet for zoos and wildlife centers across the United States”.
The Department of Transportation have officers at the enforcement points
to ensure proper transportation of the horses, but has no jurisdiction
beyond transportation matters. Horses that are severely lame or disabled
are not accepted at the plants. Haulers are supposed to be fined for
horses that arrive with any sign of abuse. Horses are transported in
trailers that are straight, gooseneck or double-decked meant for cows and
pigs, making it impossible for the average sized horse to stand properly.
A 1998 survey commissioned by the USDA/APHIS to determine where welfare
problems occur during horse transport to slaughter found severe welfare
problems in 7.7% of the transported horses, with a majority from
conditions caused by owner neglect or abuse rather than transportation.
There are US Department of Agriculture (USDA) laws governing the
transportation of horses to processing plants.
Two bills, H.R. 503 in the House and S. 1915 in the Senate, were
introduced last session to prevent the slaughter of horses for human
consumption in the United States. H.R. 503 was passed in the House on
September 7, 2006. The bill was anonymously blocked from a vote in the
Senate, so both bills died at the end of the session. H.R. 503 and S. 311
were introduced January 17, 2007. The text of the bill reads:
A bill to amend the Horse Protection Act to prohibit the shipping,
transporting, moving, delivering, receiving, possessing, purchasing,
selling, or donation of horses and other equines to be slaughtered for
human consumption, and for other purposes.
A separate bill ensures that none of America's wild mustangs are sent to
slaughter.
On February 22, 2007, Rep. Robert Molaro introduced a bill, HB1711, to the
Illinois General Assembly to prohibit the transportation of horses into
the State for the sole purpose of slaughter for human consumption.
On March 28, 2007, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
ruled that it was illegal for horse slaughterhouses to pay the USDA for
their own health inspections. The next day USDA pulled their inspectors
from Cavel, effectively ending slaughter of horses for human consumption
in the United States.
Judicial Ruling in the United States-
On January 19, 2007, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans
overturned a lower court's 2006 ruling on a 1949 Texas law that banned
horse slaughter for the purpose of selling the meat for
food on grounds that the Texas law was invalid because it had been
repealed by another statute and was pre-empted by federal law. However, a
panel of three judges on the 5th Circuit disagreed, saying the law still
stood and was still enforceable. On March 6, 2007, without comment or
dissent, the 19 judges of United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth
Circuit rejected a petition by three foreign-owned slaughter plants
seeking full court review of a three-judge panel's January 19, 2007
decision.
In June of 2007, a federal judge refused a request from the nation's last
operating horse slaughterhouse, located in Illinois, to remain open. As of
July of 2007, a legal dispute over an Illinois state ban on killing horses
for food remains unresolved .
The last remaining horse slaughter plant in the country was effectively
shut down Sept. 21 when a three-judge panel on the U.S. Court of Appeals
for the Seventh Circuit ruled an Illinois law banning horse slaughter for
human consumption is constitutional.
The ruling comes four months after Gov. Rod Blagojevich signed the law,
overwhelmingly passed by the Illinois State Senate earlier this year.
Belgian-owned Cavel International immediately filed a federal lawsuit
contesting the ban. While the lawsuit was pending, the slaughter plant was
allowed to operate, killing hundreds of horses a week.
Cavel has the option to appeal to the United States Supreme Court, but it
is likely that the justices will refuse to hear the case, as they did
earlier this year when two Texas slaughter facilities appealed their
respective closures.
As of September 2007, bills introduced in the U.S. Congress (H.R.503 and
S.311), known informally as the "American Horse Slaughter Prevention Act",
are being considered by congressional committees. The description of these
bills is "To amend the Horse Protection Act to prohibit the shipping,
transporting, moving, delivering, receiving, possessing, purchasing,
selling, or donation of horses and other equines to be slaughtered for
human consumption, and for other purposes." These bills can be viewed and
their status tracked via a Library of Congress to follow Legislation in
Current Congress.
Controversy in the United States -
There are 200 organizations that oppose the proposed ban on horse
slaughter. Included in this group are the American Quarter Horse
Association (AQHA), the largest breed association in the world; the
American Association of Equine Practitioners (AAEP); the American
Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA);[16]; and numerous animal
agriculture groups. Included in the animal agriculture groups are
organizations representing the interests of traditional food animal
industries, such as cattle, sheep, and pork, who are concerned that
banning any animal for slaughter will lead to endangering their
industries.
An argument is that abuse would multiply if the horses were not
slaughtered. However, according to a report from UC Davis, there was no
increase in cases of horse abuse in California when horse slaughter was
banned. Another argument is that banning horse slaughter in the US will
result in that the horses instead have to endure a long trip to either
Canada or Mexico to be slaughtered.
There are over 500 organizations such as the Society for Animal Protective
Legislation and Sterling Silver Farm Equine Rescue that support the
abolition of horse slaughter. The Thoroughbred and Standardbred racing
industry strongly opposes horse slaughter. Other equine organizations in
favor of the slaughter ban are the National Show Horse Registry, National
Steeplechase Association, Inc., Palomino Horse Association, Int., and
United States Eventing Association. Many equine adoption and rescue groups
such as the Animal Miracle Foundation, also oppose slaughter for human
consumption.
|